Junk Science https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html Home Junk Science? Number 142: Covid and Cancer – the Whole Truth Junk Science? Number 138: Global policy for COVID-19 vaccination needs a thorough review Junk Science? Number 127: You have to be stupid to avoid vaccination, right? Junk Science? Number 140: No one said the vaccine would fully protect you, or stop transmission Junk Science? Number 137: Side-effects from Covid Vaccines – it’s your own fault! Junk Science? Number 132: Vaccination beats natural Immunity? Junk Science? Number 128: Ivermectin doesn’t work – really? Junk Science? Number 139: The day the science died Junk Science? Number 133: The most promising vaccine candidates to fight Covid? Junk Science? Number 134: Thai Government backs local herb and Favipiravir to fight Covid-19 Sam Wilson – Editor Junk Science? Number 135: It’s time to stop the Covid non-science Junk Science? Number 136: COVID mRNA vaccine is 95% effective Junk Science? Number 130: The pandemic is only in the unvaccinated Junk Science? Number 129: Research – the vaccinated are simply not protected from Covid-19 Junk Science? Number 126: The one question Fauci must answer Junk Science? Number 119: More deaths caused by Lockdown than Covid-19 Junk Science? Number 131: Is this really the death knell for mRNA vaccines? Junk Science? Number 122: The incredible Dr Fauci Junk Science? Number 141: Covid-19 vaccines are not gene therapies Junk Science? Number 108: #FireFauci calls as strange links to the Covid emerge Junk Science? Number 121: Is the Covid-19 spike protein more dangerous than the virus?  Junk Science? Number 124: An attack on me is an attack on science (Anthony S. Fauci M.D) – Volume 2 Junk Science? Number 125: More real science on Covid-19 for Dr Anthony S. Fauci Junk Science? Number 123: An attack on me is an attack on science (Anthony S. Fauci MD) Junk Science? Number 120: Covid-19 vaccines get a rough ride Junk Science? Number 116: American Thinker on Dominion vote fraud Junk Science? Number 118: Remdisivir fails to impress in WHO research Junk Science? Number 117: Coronavirus, the Inconvenient truth Junk Science? Number 6: Statins save the world Junk Science? Number 7: Alternative medicine killed Steve Jobs Junk Science ? Number 8: Did a vitamin kill Whitney Houston? Junk Science ? Number 9: All Alternative Treatments are non-evidence based, by definition Junk science? Number 10: From WDDTY: Much more than placebo: Homeopathy reverses cancer. Junk Science? Number 11: Is the UK’s MHRA extending its remit beyond the European Law? Junk Science? Number 13: Screening Mammograms are dangerous The most vulnerable patient is the ignorant patient Junk Science? Number 14: Beware people who say ‘Drugs are safe and vitamins are dangerous’. Junk science? Number 15: Time to change the 1939 Cancer Advertising Act Junk Science? Number 16: The ‘pan-European’ (?) Herbal directive. Junk Science Number 17: The randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled Clinical Trial Junk Science? Number 18: The PSA Test for Prostate Cancer Junk Science? Number 19: Does Integrated Medicine make sense? Junk Science? Number 20: Prevent Alzheimer’s for 10 pence a day. Junk Science? Number 21: Could Breast Cancer be linked to IVF? Bad advice about cancer from icon / CANCERactive JUNK SCIENCE? Number 22: Glaxo in largest ever US drug fraud settlement Junk Science? Number 23: ANH: Scepticism and the natural medicine skeptics: Not even distantly related Junk Science? Number 24: Stop Drugs Killing People for Profits?