Skeptics
- Global Warming
Junk Science? Number 100: Global Warming is an issue far from settled – Part 2
Global Warming is an issue far from settled – Part 2 The Mail on Sunday (Feb 5th 2017) ran the…
Read More » - Homeopathy
Junk Science? Number 86: FDA counters Skeptic claims on Homeopathy
FDA counters Skeptic claims on Homeopathy It is now time to be completely confused about homeopathy. Having been bored to…
Read More » - Health
Junk Science? Number 75: Is Wikipedia misleading the public on health?
Is Wikipedia misleading the public on health? Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, contains errors in nine out of 10 of its…
Read More » - Uncategorized
Junk Science? Number 42: Professor David Colquhoun of UCL apologises
Questionable research, inaccurate conclusions, poor taste Professor David Colquhoun of UCL has formally apologised to Chris Woollams for suggesting that…
Read More » - Health
Junk Science? Number 24: Stop Drugs Killing People for Profits?
Stop Drugs Killing People for Profits! It’s been a torrid couple of years for the drugs companies. For example, there…
Read More » - Alliance for Natural Health
Junk Science? Number 23: ANH: Scepticism and the natural medicine skeptics: Not even distantly related
Scepticism and the natural medicine skeptics: not even distantly related We think it’s about time to reclaim the word ‘sceptic’…
Read More » - Complementary Cancer Therapies
Junk science? Number 15: Time to change the 1939 Cancer Advertising Act
Junk Science Number 15 (revised) : The 1939 Cancer Advertising Act is being regularly abused Decent, honest, truthful I spent…
Read More »